Article type: Manufacturer review · Written and researched by Marc Phu (China · Cosmetics Product Development & Ingredients) · Fact-checked by Kawee Chong (Singapore · Commercialisation & Sourcing) · Last reviewed 3 November 2026.
A buyer’s comparison of the three Taiwanese manufacturers independently verified to offer genuine OEM or ODM contract manufacturing of sheet or tissue-format face masks in 2026, evaluated on certification, product specialisation, scale and track record.
Quick answer
Taiwan’s sheet-mask manufacturing sector narrowed to three OEM/ODM specialists in OEMReview’s 2026 certification-first screen, each confirmed to produce tissue or sheet-format masks as a named, standalone product line rather than a generic “mask” listing. Biocrown Biotechnology leads on certification depth, with six current credentials including ISO 22716, COSMOS/ECOCERT and Halal plus 47-plus years of skincare manufacturing experience across two Taichung-area plants. TenArt Bio Tech is the clear brand-building standout, operating its own Maskingdom sheet-mask label in 28 countries including 18 airport duty-free chains since 2012. Fugeng Biotechnology trails on disclosed certification but claims Taiwan’s highest raw output among the three, citing more than 6 million products a month.
Key takeaways
- Only three Taiwanese manufacturers in OEMReview’s research pool confirm a dedicated sheet or tissue-mask format on their own sites, each qualifying on a different strength — certification breadth, export brand proof or raw output.
- Biocrown is the only candidate disclosing all six of GMP, ISO 22716, ISO 14001, COSMOS/ECOCERT, Halal and combined EU/US compliance markers at once, plus the longest operating history of the three (founded 1977).
- TenArt is the only candidate with independent, third-party-style proof that its sheet masks sell at scale outside OEM client work — its own Maskingdom brand reaches 28 countries and 18 duty-free chains.
- None of the three publishes a company-stated MOQ or lead time, a gap across the entire qualifying field rather than one supplier.
Who this list is for
This review is for brand owners sourcing beauty, skincare and personal care OEM manufacturing in Taiwan specifically for a sheet or tissue-format face mask — not a clay, peel-off, wash-off gel or mousse mask, and not a general Taiwan cosmetics factory search. It assumes the reader already has a rough product concept (substrate preference, essence formulation direction, target price tier) and is screening for a manufacturing partner rather than researching the category from scratch. Brands open to a wider range of mask formats than sheet/tissue specifically should see Fugeng’s own seven-format catalogue in the entries below, and brands sourcing sheet masks from a different country should see OEMReview’s Malaysia sheet mask and serum factories guide, and brands open to a broader Asia-wide shortlist should see OEMReview’s Top 10 Cosmetics & Skincare OEM Manufacturers in Asia.
Eligibility rules
To appear on this list, a company had to be an operating Taiwanese manufacturer with a verifiable corporate registration and a live, independently verifiable Taiwanese website, offering third-party OEM or ODM contract manufacturing of sheet or tissue-format face masks specifically — evidenced by a dedicated product page or explicit on-site confirmation of this format, not an inferred capability from a general “mask” or “skincare” listing. Three candidates passed this screen against a floor of three. Because the qualifying field is this thin, every candidate that passed is included regardless of score, and every entry below runs to full depth rather than the shorter format used for longer lists.
The list at a glance
| Manufacturer | Best for | Main advantage | Main limitation | Key fact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biocrown Biotechnology | Brands wanting the broadest certification set and substrate choice | 6 current certifications incl. ISO 22716, COSMOS/ECOCERT, Halal; 4 substrate options | Larger multi-category manufacturer rather than a mask-only specialist | Founded 1977; 2 plants plus a China branch office |
| TenArt Bio Tech | Brands wanting proven export and retail distribution | Owns Maskingdom, sold in 28 countries incl. 18 duty-free chains since 2012 | 5 certifications, one fewer disclosed credential than Biocrown | Class 100,000 cleanroom; Red Dot Design Award winner |
| Fugeng Biotechnology | Brands wanting the widest mask-format range and highest declared capacity | 7 mask formats from one factory; 6M+ products/month claimed capacity | Only 2 certifications disclosed; no Halal or organic-equivalent credential | Self-described Taiwan Top-5 cosmetics OEM manufacturer |
What sheet-mask substrate actually means for a buyer
The material a sheet mask is cut from changes both its cost and its in-use feel, and Biocrown is the only candidate in this review explicit enough about its own substrate range to make the comparison concrete: spunlace non-woven (offered in 35g and 60g weights), charcoal fiber, bio-cellulose and 3D-PET. Spunlace non-woven is the industry-standard substrate — a mechanically bonded fibre sheet that is the fastest and lowest-cost to produce, with moderate essence-holding capacity and a looser facial fit. Bio-cellulose is grown rather than cut, fermented from bacterial cultures into a gel-like sheet that conforms closely to facial contours and holds substantially more essence, which is why it commands a higher price point industry-wide and a longer production cycle. 3D-PET is a shaped synthetic substrate engineered to approximate bio-cellulose’s close fit without the fermentation time, a middle option on both cost and performance. A brand briefing a Taiwan manufacturer should specify substrate preference early, since it drives unit cost, minimum batch size for the essence fill, and shelf stability — Biocrown’s four-option range makes it the only candidate here where that conversation can start from an existing menu rather than a custom development request.
Regulatory status is simpler than substrate choice but still worth confirming before sourcing: sheet masks sit in Taiwan’s general-cosmetics category under the Cosmetic Hygiene and Safety Act, which took effect in 2019. Article 4 requires the manufacturer or importer to complete product notification and establish a product information file before a product is supplied, sold, publicly displayed or offered for consumer trial — a declarative filing rather than a pre-approval licence. This is distinct from Article 5, which reserves a stricter registration-and-licence process, with no manufacturing or import allowed until a licence is approved, for cosmetics the central competent authority separately designates as specific-purpose. A buyer sourcing a standard sheet mask from any of the three manufacturers in this review is working within the Article 4 notification track, not the heavier Article 5 process.
1. Biocrown Biotechnology
Biocrown’s differentiator is depth across every dimension at once: it is the only one of the three candidates to hold all six of GMP, ISO 22716, ISO 14001:2015, COSMOS/ECOCERT, Halal and combined EU PIF / US Federal 21 CFR 209D compliance, and it backs this with 47-plus years of skincare manufacturing experience from Dali District, Taichung, running two in-house plants plus a China branch office. On product range it is also the most explicit of the three about sheet-mask substrate options specifically, listing four distinct materials on its own site — 35g and 60g spunlace non-woven, charcoal fiber, bio-cellulose and 3D-PET — alongside a wider catalogue spanning sunscreen, mother-and-baby care, body care and makeup. Certifications are company-stated on Biocrown’s own pages and were not independently verified with each issuing body, in line with this review’s standard screening method. Best suited for a brand that wants the broadest certification paper trail and format choice from a single Taiwan factory, and is comfortable working with a larger, multi-category manufacturer rather than a sheet-mask specialist; less ideal for a brand wanting a single-format partner whose business is built around masks alone, which is where TenArt’s narrower brand focus is the stronger fit.
2. TenArt Bio Tech
TenArt’s differentiator is proven export reach under its own name: since 2012 it has run Maskingdom (膏歯), a dedicated sheet-mask brand sold in 28 countries including 18 airport duty-free chains, a level of independent market validation neither Biocrown nor Fugeng discloses for their own-brand sheet-mask lines. Operating from the Xizhi Industrial Zone in Taipei since its 2010 founding, TenArt holds five current certifications — ECOCERT organic-factory status, GMP/ISO 22716, Halal, EU PIF and FDA — manufactures from a Class 100,000 cleanroom, and has won a Red Dot Design Award and a Pittsburgh Invention Award, both company-stated on its own site and not independently verified with the issuing bodies. Beyond masks, TenArt also runs the Babysassi mother-and-baby and ERH skincare brands, giving it OEM experience adjacent to sheet-mask formulation. Best suited for a brand that wants a manufacturer with its own proven international retail and duty-free distribution track record, useful evidence if a buyer is weighing export potential for a private-label line; less ideal for a brand prioritising the single deepest certification set available, where Biocrown’s six-credential disclosure is broader than TenArt’s five.
3. Fugeng Biotechnology
Fugeng’s differentiator is declared scale: operating from Hemei Township, Changhua County, it describes itself as a Taiwan Top-5 cosmetics OEM manufacturer with capacity exceeding 6 million products a month, the highest disclosed output figure of the three candidates, though this positioning is company-stated and was not independently verified against third-party production data. Its sheet-mask line (布敵型面膏) is one of seven mask formats it offers, alongside mud, peel-off, carbonated-gel, mousse, jelly and cream masks — the widest mask-format range of the three, useful for a brand that wants one factory capable of expanding beyond sheet masks later. Fugeng discloses the thinnest certification set of the three, with GMP and ISO 22716 confirmed on its own site but none of the organic, Halal or export-compliance credentials Biocrown and TenArt both carry, and no founding year is disclosed. Best suited for a brand prioritising raw production capacity and format flexibility across multiple mask types from one supplier; less ideal for a brand that needs Halal or organic certification confirmed on-page before first contact, where both other candidates currently disclose more.
How they compare
The three candidates split along a certification-versus-brand-proof-versus-scale trade-off rather than any one of them leading on every measure. Biocrown is the only candidate disclosing all six certification types tracked in this review and the longest operating history by a wide margin (1977 versus TenArt’s 2010 and an undisclosed founding year for Fugeng), making it the strongest paper trail for a brand that needs documentation ready for a retail buyer’s own compliance review. TenArt is the only candidate with independent, third-party-style proof that its sheet masks sell at scale outside OEM work — Maskingdom’s presence in 28 countries and 18 duty-free chains is evidence no amount of certification disclosure can substitute for. Fugeng’s 6-million-unit-a-month claim is the largest raw capacity figure among the three, and its seven-format mask range is the widest, but it is also the only candidate without Halal or organic-equivalent certification currently disclosed.
All three converge on one gap: none publishes a company-stated MOQ or lead time, so a buyer comparing total cost or minimum order size across this shortlist will need to request quotes directly rather than relying on published figures. Certification claims across all three are company-stated and were not independently verified with the issuing bodies as part of this review.
Which one should you choose?
Choose Biocrown Biotechnology if you want the single broadest certification set available from a Taiwan sheet-mask supplier, a choice of four distinct mask substrates, and a long, multi-decade operating history to show a retail buyer or export market’s compliance review. Choose TenArt Bio Tech if you want proof that your manufacturer can also move product internationally under its own name — Maskingdom’s 28-country, 18-duty-free-chain footprint is the clearest independent signal of commercial viability among the three. Choose Fugeng Biotechnology if your priority is raw production capacity and the option to expand into other mask formats (mud, peel-off, gel, cream) from the same factory later, and you are comfortable confirming Halal or organic certification status directly before shortlisting.
Notable exclusions
This review’s Taiwan OEM pool was built across earlier topics researched in the same session and reused in full for this sheet-mask screen; no additional Taiwan-based manufacturer outside Biocrown, TenArt and Fugeng was identified with a confirmed, named sheet or tissue-mask product line at the time of research. This is a narrower field than a general “Taiwan cosmetics OEM” search would surface — several manufacturers in the broader pool make face masks in formats such as clay, peel-off or wash-off gel without a dedicated sheet or tissue-format line, and were not eligible for this specific list. A brand open to a wider mask-format range than sheet/tissue specifically should see Fugeng’s own seven-format catalogue above, or OEMReview’s Malaysia sheet mask and serum factories guide for a different country’s manufacturer pool. No candidate that met this review’s sheet-mask screen was excluded from the final three.
Methodology
Candidates were scored across four weighted dimensions: certification (30%), product specialisation (25%), scale and capacity (25%) and track record (20%), based on evidence gathered from each company’s own official website. Because only three candidates passed the eligibility screen against a floor of three, this review presents all three in full rather than applying a cut line, and every entry above runs to full depth per this review’s thin-list standard. Research for this topic was captured on 26 August 2026. This review draws on public company websites only — no factory visits, sample orders or direct price quotations were obtained, and no certification, award or capacity figure was independently verified with the issuing body or a third party.
FAQ
What is the minimum order quantity for sheet mask manufacturing in Taiwan in 2026?
None of the three Taiwan sheet-mask manufacturers in this 2026 review — Biocrown, TenArt or Fugeng — publish a company-stated MOQ on their public pages. A buyer should request a direct quote from each, since sheet-mask MOQ typically depends on substrate material, essence formulation and packaging format.
Which Taiwan sheet-mask manufacturer has the most certifications?
Biocrown Biotechnology discloses the broadest certification set of the three candidates in this 2026 review, with six current credentials — GMP, ISO 22716, ISO 14001:2015, COSMOS/ECOCERT, Halal and combined EU PIF / US Federal 21 CFR 209D compliance. TenArt Bio Tech discloses five, and Fugeng Biotechnology discloses two (GMP and ISO 22716).
Does a sheet mask need to be registered with Taiwan’s FDA before it can be sold?
Yes, but only at the notification level that applies to general cosmetics. Under Article 4 of Taiwan’s Cosmetic Hygiene and Safety Act, a sheet mask manufacturer or importer must complete product notification and establish a product information file before the product is supplied, sold or displayed; this is separate from the stricter Article 5 registration-and-licence process reserved for cosmetics the authority designates as specific-purpose, a category sheet masks do not fall into.
What is the difference between spunlace, bio-cellulose and 3D-PET sheet-mask substrates?
Spunlace non-woven is the most common and typically the lowest-cost substrate, offering moderate essence absorption and fit. Bio-cellulose is produced by fermentation, conforms more closely to facial contours and holds more essence, usually at a higher cost. 3D-PET is a shaped synthetic substrate designed for closer facial fit without the production time bio-cellulose requires. Biocrown is the only candidate in this review confirmed to offer all three formats directly.
Which of these three Taiwan manufacturers has the longest track record?
Biocrown Biotechnology, founded in 1977, has by far the longest disclosed operating history among the three candidates in this 2026 review — 47-plus years against TenArt’s founding in 2010. Fugeng Biotechnology does not disclose a founding year on its public pages.
Sources and references
- Biocrown Biotechnology — Face Mask category page, product page
- TenArt Bio Tech — company website, Maskingdom brand site
- Fugeng Biotechnology — mask product page
- Laws & Regulations Database of the Republic of China (Taiwan) — Cosmetic Hygiene and Safety Act
Limitations
This review is based entirely on information published on each manufacturer’s own website as of the August 2026 research date; certifications, awards and capacity figures were not independently verified with the issuing bodies or any third party. No MOQ or lead time is published by any of the three candidates, so these figures could not be compared and must be obtained directly from each manufacturer.
Update history
3 November 2026: First published.
